Archives for posts with tag: management

How do you convince an organization to use Scrum or another agile practice and really adopt it?

I asked this question to three Project Managers experienced with agile practices and traditional approaches.

Jesse Fewell, JesseFewell.com

“PMI CEO Greg Balestrero has been talking a lot lately about moving the Project Management field away from performance-to-plan and toward value-delivery. Often the key barriers are stereotypes about Agile (“renegades who do what they want”) and Lean (“doing the same amount of work with fewer resources”).

In the end, every organization wants to “deliver value early and deliver value often”, and that is what Agile is all about. As a result, you find many organizations quickly sign on to experiment with Agile.

The difficulty comes when Agile starts to create transparency and accountability. Most organizations are not used to that, and will go through many “growing pains” that will either slow down or completely stop an Agile adoption effort. For example, the modern Project Manager is called upon to fill many roles at once, which masks a lot of confused responsibilities in the organization.

When the Project Manager starts pushing more decisions onto the sponsor, and more accountability onto the project team, things can get awkward and frustrating. But you have to go through that discomfort in order to grow. “No pain, no gain”.

Convincing organizations to “Go Agile” is not so hard. The greatest difficulty is convincing organizations to “stay Agile.”

Craig Brown, BetterProjects.net

“Project managers can’t convince an organization or senior management to adopt Scrum.

The owners of the project have to want to change. Project managers can simply provide Scrum as an option. Someone needs to have an urgent and important problem that they both see intellectually and feel emotionally.

IT managers and project managers are much more likely to feel the pain and seek help via agile methods than operations project managers or non-IT executives. The IT folk are at the end of the delivery chain and so when things go wrong at any stage of a project it is usually discovered at the IT delivery end.

If you are dealing with IT manager only, you’ll find kindred spirits who want to throw off the shackles of dysfunctional process.

If on the other hand you are dealing with people who don’t usually work on projects, or people who only deal with the front end of projects (initiation, requirement specification, and maybe design) then you’ll have a harder time convincing them of the need for change. They aren’t feeling the pain.

Recently I read a paper by a project manager who implemented scrum at a Queensland government department. It is here (PDF); (discovered here).

You’d think senior execs would want a change, but their business isn’t IT and they have process experts and auditors who are used to working a particular way. Convincing them to change is possible, but you have to be the right person with the right levels of trust and so on.”

Bob Tarne, Zen-Pm.blogspot.com

“I think each organization is different and therefore there could be different reasons for why organizations should adopt Scrum/agile. In the situations I’ve been in the biggest benefit for adopting agile is to increase the speed of delivery. I’ve worked with organizations that get to caught up in analysis/design.

They try to get answers that aren’t available yet and build the system around that, finding that they need to go back and make changes, which slows things down. Since change is inevitable, you need to spend less time trying to lock down the design up front and build your process to quickly identify and accept the changes.”

Image by Army.mil.

You’ll love this episode about leadership.

In Episode 19 of The Project Shrink Podcast I am talking to Dave Logan about Tribal Leadership. Dave is a best-selling author, an expert in cultural transformation in the workplace, a senior partner at CultureSync and on the faculty of the Marshall School of Business.

He co-authored the book Tribal Leadership: Leveraging Natural Groups to Build a Thriving Organization. This book describes a ten-year, 24,000-person study that shows corporate leaders how they can use their tribes.

You can watch the episode below or follow this link.

Subscribe with iTunes to “The Project Shrink Podcast”
Full Video Version of Project Shrink videocast
Audio Only Version of Project Shrink podcast

Subscribe using other podcatcher software (iPodder, Juice etc.):
Video or Audio

In this episode of “The Project Shrink” I am talking to Jerry Manas. Jerry is an organizational architect and author of two books: “Napoleon on Project Management” and “Managing The Gray Areas”. We are talking about the “gray areas”.

Managing projects is all about finding balances, finding the right touch for the right occasion. Jerry has has identified 6 of these balances and calls them “gray areas”.

He answers the following questions:

  • How can one meet the needs of individuals and the needs of the organization?
  • How can you maintain a sense of order without compromising productivity?
  • How much can you trust the people on your team to do what they’re supposed to do?

You can watch the interview below or follow this link to YouTube.com.

You can find more information about Jerry on his company website, or you can visit his blog.

New: Subscribe with iTunes to “The Project Shrink” episodes

You can subscribe to this (and all other) video(s) using iTunes. It is available as a full video version or audio (mp3) only.

itunes icon Managing The Gray Areas With Jerry Manas Subscribe with iTunes to the full video version of Project Shrink videocast
itunes icon Managing The Gray Areas With Jerry Manas Subscribe with iTunes to the audio only version of Project Shrink podcast

This is a posting in The Fish Pond Metaphor series by Ali Anani and Bas de Baar

As projects start and end within organizations the demand for employees fluctuates. It seems that in certain times the workforce is just too small to handle all tasks, and in slow times many employees are doing nothing. With change and with projects come the tidal movement of need of labor force. Most projects will be done in times of change, when economic forces are up or down. Times of stability don’t call for much projects.

Hibernation: After Busy Times, Leave Them Alone

fish2 Lessons From The Pond For The Project Workforce
(more…)

by Ali Anani and Bas de Baar

In this posting we will introduce a view on organizational structures using The Fish Pond. It provides an alternative perspective in answering the question whether we should have flat organizations, pyramidal organizations or something in between. We will use the process of pond stratification as illustration.

1898802966_23f9063773.jpg

(more…)