Bas de Baar discusses Project Management in a global, mobile, virtual and multi-cultural world.

More about Bas & this site
Projects Are About Humans. Deal With That!

The Four Dharmas Of Project Management

Email This Post Email This Post | Print This Post Print This Post


"I want to stay as close to the edge as I can without going over. Out on the edge you see all kinds of things you can't see from the center." -Kurt Vonnegut

Projects are about humans. I know; it says so on my blog. Projects are people working together.

Problems in projects are people problems. I know; research says so. And my blog.

Currently projects operate in complex, mobile, global, on-demand, around the clock, instant and diverse environment. I know you know.

dharma The Four Dharmas Of Project Management

THE question is how we can mold Project Managers in such a way that they can operate within this context? It sounds to me that we should focus on people, people working together, complexity and globalization. And of course another zillion aspects.

We should be getting PMs using all three parts of their brain (left, right and heart). That might not be the "pure" Project Management discipline curriculum. Who cares. If it is what we need, you can call it whatever you want, as long as you educate yourself along those lines.

We need to educate ourselves as Project Managers. But not in new checklists or new procedures. We need to learn the fundamentals, the "why's". It will last longer.

"Give a Man a Fish, Feed Him For a Day. Teach a Man to Fish, Feed Him For a Lifetime" - Lao Tzu

This year, I learned that you cannot jump from the PMBoK directly to topics like "mental flexibility" and "emotional intelligence". I am sorry to tell you, but most people cannot make that jump that fast. A path to "project enlightenment" has to be defined. Conveniently, I think I have one.

In Buddhism teachings are presented in Turnings of The Wheel Of Dharma. Each turn builds upon the previous one and brings the student to a higher level of consciousness. I love this as a metaphor. It provides a great analogy for my path to "project enlightenment"…

The Four Dharmas Of Project Management

I assume that you already have basic knowledge of Project Management (again, there is nothing wrong with that, it is just that you need more). The four steps you take from there are:

First Turn: Flow Of Stakes
Second Turn: Structure For Resilience
Third Turn: Global Pool
Fourth Turn: Mental Flexibility

In this post I will provide a short introduction to every turn. In the next months I will give this wheel a good yank and let it spin: explanations will take place, but also heavy interaction with you and all other readers. This an ambitious undertaking, and as with all other projects, I cannot do this on my own. :)

flow-of-stakes The Four Dharmas Of Project Management

First Turn: Flow Of Stakes

What I really want to tell people immediately after they finish their PM course, formed the basics for my book "Surprise! Now You're A Software Project Manager". That of course, would be the first turn of the PM wheel. The two major concepts addressed in the book are:

  • The Flow Of Stakes
  • Project Potion

The Flow Of Stakes

The most important aspect is the mindset of the project manager. He should focus on one simple mental image of the jobs he has to perform instead of trying to cram 500 pages of charting and calculating into his head. He should know the flow of stakes:

  • Stakeholders have stakes
  • Stakeholders communicate their stakes by expressing their expectations, and these are more formally defined by means of requirements to the process or product
  • Project management should make every stakeholder a winner by accepting and creating requirements that continually satisfy the stakes of individual stakeholders and do not conflict with the general process or the product
  • Project management should give continuous feedback to the stakeholders on the state of the stakes
  • Based upon this feedback, the expectations and requirements might change, and in this way a new cycle begins.

For a lot of people involved in projects, one inescapable conclusion still comes as a big surprise: project management is a people business. It’s all about keeping everyone associated with the project happy by supporting his or her stakes. The trouble with stakes is that no one tells you what they are. You have to guess, negotiate, anticipate, and manipulate to get past the requirements and directly through to the fears and wishes of people. Software project management is more about psychology than technology.

Project Potion

Different project circumstances require different approaches to ensure optimum effectiveness. As mentioned above, it is the people who largely determine these circumstances, and you have to tailor your software approach to the particular situation. For this you can make use of techniques and tools from different existing methods by simply mixing and matching everything together in such a way that you brew the right Project Potion for the occasion.

Concocting a Project Potion consists of the following steps:

  • You analyze the stakeholders and their interests and expectations (Stakeholder Analysis).
  • You analyze the products (technical stuff) you have to create.
  • You determine the potential risks that might exist (Risk Management).
  • You create a project approach that reduces those risks, and for this you have three main tools:
    • Strategy: What are the steps taken in the project, and what are the sequence and time frame?
    • Organization: How is your project organization constructed?
    • Feedback: How is the feedback to the stakeholders on the status and content of products and processes organized?

structure-for-resilience The Four Dharmas Of Project Management

Second Turn: Structure For Resilience

The first turn addressed the link between individual stakeholders and the effect of these stakeholders on running the project. In the second turn you will focus more on the interaction of people.

Whatever your take is on projects, at the end of the day it is just a bunch of people working together to achieve a certain goal. During this endeavor they laugh, cry, pull pranks, play dirty tricks and have all other kind of behavior towards each other. If you are lucky they even work to reach the final goal. If you take everything away, and put people in the center of what a "project" is, you will see a group of stakeholders interacting with each other, just like any other group of people would do.

Just to make things easier on our lives, we call the result of all this behavior “the project”. In this sense it is nothing more than an abstraction. If we say "the project is late", this doesn’t mean that some creature or entity from outer space showed up later than expected; it is the result of the project people working together that wasn’t finished on the time we predicted.

Social Interactions

If we look at the interactions between the stakeholders, some categories may come in handy to divide up the beast we are trying to concur; it is always easier to cut a complex issue into smaller parts when trying to make some sense of it. For this purpose I will use three dimensions for interactions in teams: the power structure, the task structure and the information structure.

The power structure can best be viewed as the hierarchy that exists, it is, if you want, a vertical dimension. The task structure is the structure that consists to perform the actual work; these are interactions that are needed to finish or start a certain task. If the previous dimension is vertical, you can think of this one as horizontal. And the last structure concerning information, are the interactions based upon the exchange of information. This dimension goes from left to right, from top to bottom, so in fact, going all over the place.

The power structure will contain subjects like hierarchical control and planning, the way people are instructed and how the boss is treated back. Concepts like authorization and responsibilities are handled within this dimension. The task structure can be viewed as the actual production chain, it contains all needed interaction to perform task and to create the products. And finally the information structure, subject within this dimension is how, what and when information is provided when the project people are communicating.

Resilience To Cope With Change

In this view a project is a human system working towards a desired goal. However, the project is running within an environment that is changing continuously. The project needs ways to deal with these changes and still keep performing its function, that is, reaching the desired goal. The project needs "resilience".

"Resilience is… the ability to absorb disturbances, to be changed and then to re-organize and still have the same identity (retain the same basic structure and ways of functioning). It includes the ability to learn from the disturbance. A resilient system is forgiving of external shocks. As resilience declines the magnitude of a shock from which it cannot recover gets smaller and smaller. Resilience shifts attention from purely growth and efficiency to needed recovery and flexibility." (source)

Resilience can be found in the individual members of the group, and within the interactions between the members. For the individual person adaption is created by having an open and flexible mind, and having the proper social network.

global-pool The Four Dharmas Of Project Management

Third Turn: Global Pool

Interactions between people don't "just happen". We live in a big world and you and I don't know everybody else. But somehow, for some reason groups of people emerge, interactions are created. In the third turn called "Global Pool" we address why people are getting together and how and why certain interactions emerge.

Economic Clustering

Like the oceans are all connected to each other and provide us with currents, so are the economic forces in constant flux and alternating over the globe. Work moves around. If it can be produced cheaper, more efficiently or better, it gets relocated. Talent moves around. If one area on the globe is more exciting and thrilling than another, people relocate. Work moves around and people that perform the work move around. Not necessarily dependent of each other.

Regional population changes rapidly. Asia gets a booming population growth. First world nations have a enormous amount of seniors coming towards them as the baby boomers are getting old. With regional changes in the populations, the demand for work shifts.

But one remarkable aspect is that work seems to be located around certain topological centers like a harbor, a place rich of natural resources or just cities. Work is not spread out evenly over the planet. There are concentrations of it. The same goes for the other current, that of talent moving around. The most incredible, creative talent is looking for great places to live. Places where tolerant stimulating locations provide company of like minded people. Both currents have as a net effect that people are clustering, one gets clusters because people have the need to satisfy their economic needs.

Social Clustering

Suppose the map of the earth doesn't reflect countries, but they represent ideas. Or they would represent religions, world views, life styles and other concepts. Imagine a spatial representation of concepts. People will not be spread out evenly. What you will see is that people are cuddling up next to each other. As their social needs by definition can only be fulfilled in relationship to other people, the association needed with groups ensures the clustering will be a fact when using a conceptual map.

The removal of trade and other barriers, the ever increasing availability of cheap communication are what puts the village into Global Village. The impact is not only economic. Globalization also has its effects on social needs:

By the end of the twentieth century, if not before, globalization had turned world order into a problem. Everyone must now reflexively respond to the common predicament of living in one world. This provokes the formulation of contending world views. For example, some portray the world as an assembly of distinct communities, highlighting the virtues of particularism, while others view it as developing toward a single overarching organization, representing the presumed interests of humanity as a whole. (source)

How Projects Emerge

For a project to form we cannot simply wait for people to float by. You have to enforce the clustering. Software projects are ideal conditions for using labor from all parts of the world and using technology to let people work together. Even the main output of the endeavor (software) is digital! If you are trying to get on board a fabulous project team, you are competing with the rest of the world. Why should the project manager pick you? Why should the organization pick you as a PM? Why should they have even heard of you? "Self promotion, Baby!" What makes you "you"? Why are you more suited for the job then the rest of the crowd?

And reverse: why should people want to work on your project? Because you have a project that is life changing, that is worth their effort. Because you provide an awesome creative and inspiring environment. You provide leadership that inspires people to rise to the occasion, to become larger than themselves. You give trust, and you can be trusted.

flexible-mind The Four Dharmas Of Project Management

Fourth Turn: Flexible Mind

Change is the norm. Change is happening fast. The projects you are managing are not your daddy's projects. To be able to handle the ever morphing environment, you need to become agile, flexible as you have never been before. To cope with the environment you need a brain that can use many mental models to look at reality. You need to be able to throw away your pre-programmed belief and adopt a different mindset in the blink of an eye. The essential part of becoming a flexible Project Manager therefor starts within the comfort of your own head. In this final turn I will outline the three steps that should guide your journey:

Self-Aware

The first step is to become aware of why you do what you do. Do you perform tasks because you are expected to do so, or do they really solve a problem or mitigate a risk? Are you aware of why you have organized the project in a certain way? Do you know the benefits and drawbacks of every procedure you installed in your team?

Emphatic

After becoming self-aware you can start guessing why others are doing what they are doing. First you guess, later you ask. This is the same process to become self-aware, only this time you adopt different assumptions, take on a believe system that is not your own. If you are used to run a country and you have a communist background, you probably are trying to regulate, centralize and formalize as much as possible. You want to control every individual behavior in order to control the whole system. When you are raised with a more laissez-faire world view, you can adopt a reign that is totally governed by the free market. Nothing is centrally controlled, everything will take care of itself. If you run one country, to become more emphatic, you will use the other mindset for a while.

Holistic

Free at last. Free at last.

In this final stage you are able to use all kind of mental models. You are aware of what triggers what. You can mix and match from different world views. You use an Agile planing within a Prince 2 organization. And you know why you use it! You get to know how to look at dynamic-complexity without getting into a spasm. You come up with all new kind of weird mental models.


Bas de Baar, blogging as "The Project Shrink", is taking his message to the International Project Management community with a vengeance: "Projects Are About Humans, Now Deal With That!" With over a decade spent in the trenches as Software Project Manager within the publishing industry, running multi-national teams, he has a lot to talk about.

Bas is the editor of SoftwareProjects.org, a website dedicated to all those people who make up IT projects. He holds a masters degree in Business Informatics and currently lives with his wife in the coastal town of Zandvoort, The Netherlands. His latest book, "Surprise! Now You’re a Software Project Manager", was published in September 2006.

If you like this post then please subscribe to my full feed RSS. You can also subscribe by Email. Not sure how this works?

How to get your own picture with your comment?

22 Comments so far

  1. mohammed jabari November 23rd, 2008 9:02 pm

    this article is very accurate and am with every single word of it

    thank you for the post

    wish you the best

    mohammed jabari

    general manager
    Tatweer information technology
    mohammed@progress.ps
    http://www.progress.ps

  2. Rich Maltzman November 23rd, 2008 9:09 pm

    As usual, a masterpiece. I think I'll point my corporate blog over here - it's very well done. Oops - a carnivore joke in the midst of all of this dharma…

    Rich Maltzman, PMP
    Scope Crepe
    http://scopecrepe.blogspot.com

  3. [...] The Four Dharmas of Project Management by Bas de Baar - Project Shrink [...]

  4. Ali Anani November 24th, 2008 6:18 am

    Bas, Your article is a brain teaser
    The turnining of wheels is a great metaphor. It provides a new perspective to project management. This article is bound to create many comments.
    I fully agree with your approach in starting with the hard skill and then the soft skill requirements to implement what I would call the "The Hard Requirements". No matter how hard these requirements are we may only satisfy them with soft skills. The input for any task is time, materials and human resources. The soft skills of the human resources are influenced mostly by resilience to changes and pressures.
    I have one negative comment. You mentioned in your article, and I copy and paste "If we look at the interactions between the stakeholders, some categories may come in handy to divide up the beast we are trying to concur; it is always easier to cut a complex issue into smaller parts when trying to make some sense of it. For this purpose I will use three dimensions for interactions in teams: the power structure, the task structure and the information structure." This is a reductionist approach and is contradicting the complexity approach. I feel that a better approach would be to build a self-similar repeating structure of the four turnings. This way only we observe the emergence of new phenomena, and not by the reductionist approach.
    Your article is a sound reading indeed

    Ali Anani

  5. Ali Anani November 24th, 2008 6:58 am

    I forgot to add that each wheel leads to a higher level wheel (loop). this is consistent with the complexity approach. If we think deeper we find your approach, Bas, is similar to the OODA loop. Observarion leading to orientation. This in turn leads to decision-making and then acting. Acting is based on information, beliefs, resilience and desire to act. Action comes last. In the same token, project managers should only act when they have assurances that staff have the desire, ability and resilience to act. The OODA loop is complex because of it undergoes feedback. So is your four wheel metaphor. I assume it is complex and that a reductiont approach is unsuitable

    Ali Anani

  6. Annette November 24th, 2008 10:03 am

    BAs this is a great article! Very appropriate and realistic. I am most struck with "Software project management is more about psychology than technology". Very true. Usually, the most important component to manage in a project are the people themselves.

    Thanks for this article.

  7. abemoslm November 24th, 2008 10:37 am

    thank u for your article and it is very efficient

  8. Kimberly Wiefling November 24th, 2008 11:27 am

    Excellent, Bas! So much to love here, but perhaps the most enormously valuable is your discussion of stakeholders. Everything we do in a project is FOR SOMEBODY! The project's entire reason for being, success criteria and metrics, priorities, plans, activities, all need to focus on these people. The first conversation in any project needs to be WHO are we doing this for? . . . WHO cares? . . . WHO can help us? . . . and WHO can hurt us?

    The WHAT and HOW spring from the WHO.

    It is ALL about PEOPLE.

    - Kimberly Wiefling, Author, Scrappy Project Management

  9. Tamar Chansky November 24th, 2008 2:42 pm

    Hello, what a great article. I found it on a google search for "resilience," but found so much more! My work is helping parents coach their kids to be more flexible and resilient and use all parts of their brain (and heart), and… to not fear failure.

    If you want to start your kids working on these skills now, you may want to check out my book, Freeing Your Child from Negative Thinking: Powerful, Practical Strategies to Build a Lifetime of Resilience, Flexibility and Happiness (www.freeingyourchild.com). Parents are finding that they're getting a refresher course on these ideas too!

  10. waqas khan November 24th, 2008 4:53 pm

    hi
    I read this article and its a very efficient article.
    thank you for sending me the email

  11. Dr Sabjit Singh November 24th, 2008 4:56 pm

    Congrats Bas,
    Indeed project management is all about people getting the best out of people. People management is very important when dealing with project teams which are of different nationalities and located at different part of the world with different time zone and different value system. In handling global projects it is good practice for a team manager or / his /her member to visit and interact with other teams for few days and then get back to home location . This gives good understanding of each other’s strength and attitude/ behavior. It is natural that many a time same thing looks different to different people and dispersed teams may proceed to develop their modules as what they thought right. That could lead to problems of interfacing with other modules .
    Few additional things which a successful manager should have :
    1) Transparency
    2) Adaptability to accommodate changes
    3) Innovation/ creativity in developing solutions.
    4) Keep design simple/ flexible which is easy to port / modify /interface.
    5) Reusability of available resources is important rather than re-inventing the wheel
    6) Ownership of people leader to ownership of projects and work towards common goal.

    I will send detailed comments/ suggestions by e-mail
    Regards
    Dr Sarbjit Singh
    Executive Director , Apeejay College of Engineering, Gurgoan , India

  12. Bas de Baar November 25th, 2008 5:16 am

    WOW!

    Thanks everyone for the kind and great comments. Looking forward to a fruitful (and FUN!) discussion. And yes, do send (or post) comments and suggestions. (email address is in the sidebar).

    Cheers
    Bas

  13. R.Vetrivel November 25th, 2008 5:25 pm

    Hi,

    You have covered the aspects of the PM and their relative actions to mind when they are in different stages of PAST, Present, Future, and on going.

    I saw the consolidated words of my passion on Project Management and you have enlightened it.

  14. Murtala November 26th, 2008 8:52 am

    Bas de Baar, thanks very much for this article and other subsequent articles you have being developing and sending to very one. they are very meaningful, and really make hard job become aesy to handle. once more thanks a million times.

    cheers
    Murtala

  15. Jameson Malayil Tinoy November 26th, 2008 10:39 am

    Thank you for your article about project management.
    I read this and understands its very effective for a successful professional employment

  16. Jacques Mekok November 26th, 2008 10:52 am

    Hi
    Thanks for such a work. even if we know number of things it always sound nice with metaphor.
    It's clear that dveloment is about people, so every thing we do is for them.
    Could all project managers come down to these basics … to better achieve their goals

  17. Bas de Baar November 27th, 2008 7:30 pm

    Thanks you all for your kind replies… this means a lot.

  18. Nkosinathi November 29th, 2008 5:56 pm

    Hi,
    I must say this is the most practical article I have ever read on what real life projects really entails. Yes, we do have various methodologies that are trying to built sone discipline around project management, BUT you find that they lack the real practical side.

    Thanks again for your wise insight and good luck.

  19. Abhijeet Shelar November 29th, 2008 6:05 pm

    Hello !
    This is a very precise & important information you have shared with us..Do keep us updated with your Oceans knowledge in Project Managment..
    Wish you all the very best!!
    Warm Regards,
    Abhijeet Shelar
    (Planning Er.
    Dubai)

  20. Bas December 5th, 2008 1:32 pm

    Nkosinathi and Abhijeet, thank you both for your kind words.

  21. Bashir Ahmed Malik December 12th, 2008 11:57 am

    Nice

    I agreed With All Points

    Regards

    Bashir Ahmed Malik

  22. [...] Second Turn of "The Four Dharmas Of Project Management" is titled "Structure For Resilience". In this view a project is a human system working towards a [...]

Leave a reply